[22] Goldhagen, in contrast, declared the term "indifference" to be unacceptable, contending that the vast majority of Germans were active antisemites who wanted to kill Jews in the most "pitiless" and "callous" manner possible. "[91] Rosenbaum asked Goldhagen about Richard Levy's 1975 book The Downfall of the Anti-Semitic Political Parties in Imperial Germany which traced the decline of the vlkisch parties in the early 20th century until they were all but wiped out in the 1912 Reichstag election. We also learn that only the Germans could commit a genocide of this scale due to their unique evil. From mobile killing units, to the camps, to the death marches, Goldhagen shows how ordinary Germans, nurtured in a society where Jews were seen as unalterable evil and dangerous, willingly followed their beliefs to their logical conclusion.Hitlers Willing Executioners is an original, indeed brilliant contribution to theliterature on the Holocaust.New York Review of BooksThe most important book ever published about the HolocaustEloquently written, meticulously documented, impassionedA model of moral and scholarly integrity.Philadelphia Inquirer. Advertisement Read Next Marion Graeffin Doenhoff, reply by Gordon A. Craig It would be more accurate to say Germans are unusually organized than unusually evil. Only elderly Poles, mostly women, remained in the village, as the younger Poles had all fled. Politics; Books & the Arts; May 21, 2001 Issue; Hitler's Willing Executives Hitler's Willing Executives John Friedman reviews Edwin Black's IBM and the Holocaust and Reinhold Billstein et al . My rating is a split verdict: the author has an interesting yet poorly written argument; neither element should be decisive in convincing potential readers to take up the book or ignore it. [35], Goldhagen was awarded the Democracy Prize in 1997 by the German Journal for German and International Politics, which asserted that "because of the penetrating quality and the moral power of his presentation, Daniel Goldhagen has greatly stirred the consciousness of the German public." Hitler soon became the dictator of Germany and started WWII. [87] "[W]hy does this book, so lacking in factual content and logical rigour, demand so much attention?" THIS is Hannah Arendt's "banality of evil." If this book was widely followed, we would have little chance of preventing future genocides. Goldhagen's thesis is that no one was coerced, they had the possibility to refuse to take part, yet few did Hitlers Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen is a richly detailed and provocative history of the Holocaust. [37][41] Elie Wiesel praised the work as something every German schoolchild should read. [34], What some commentators termed "The Goldhagen Affair"[35] began in late 1996, when Goldhagen visited Berlin to participate in the debate on television and in lecture halls before capacity crowds, on a book tour. petrators, who made willing choices.5 In comparison with other explanations of the Holocaust, Goldhagen's argument combines aspects of the older intentionalist school, which argues that it was Hitler's plan all along to murder the Jews, with what Omer Bartov calls the "common sense" school, especially influential among orthodox Jews. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996 Pagination Complete Pagination: 622 pages Finally, we learn that Germans overwhelmingly supported these measures because the Nazis didn't punish opposition like the Soviets did! Avoid this book, in my opinion. The Austrian-born American historian Raul Hilberg has stated that Goldhagen is "totally wrong about everything. Totally wrong. [19] The British historian Sir Ian Kershaw, a leading expert in the social history of the Third Reich, wrote, "The road to Auschwitz was built by hate, but paved with indifference,"[20][21] that is, that the progress leading up to Auschwitz was motivated by a vicious form of antisemitism on the part of the Nazi elite, but that it took place in a context where the majority of German public opinion was indifferent to what was happening. Hitler's Willing Executioners was dismissed as fundamentally ahistorical in Commentary, of all places, and as a "bizarre inversion of the Nazi view of the Jews as an insidious, inherently. Under its influence, the vast majority of Germans wanted to eliminate Jews from German society, and the perpetrators of the Holocaust did what they did because they thought it was "right and necessary." Ruth Bettina Birn and Volker Riess recognised the need to examine the primary sources (the Police Battalion investigation records) Goldhagen had cited and determine if Goldhagen had applied the historical method in his research. Christopher Browning wrote in response to Goldhagen's criticism of him in the 1998 "Afterword" to Ordinary Men published by HarperCollins: Goldhagen must prove not only that Germans treated Jewish and non-Jewish victims differently (on which virtually all historians agree), but also that the different treatment is to be explained fundamentally by the antisemitic motivation of the vast majority of the perpetrators and not by other possible motivations, such as compliance with different government policies for different victim groups. [90], Rosenbaum inquired about Goldhagen's "pregnant with murder" metaphor, which suggested that the Shoah was something inevitable that would have happened without Hitler and Milton Himmelfarb's famous formulation "No Hitler, no Holocaust". Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. [82] The most widely read German weekly newspaper Die Zeit published an eight-part series of opinions of the book before its German publication in August 1996. [18], Hitler's Willing Executioners marked a revisionist challenge to the prevailing orthodoxy surrounding the question of German public opinion and the Final Solution. By clicking Sign Up, I acknowledge that I have read and agree to Penguin Random House's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and understand that Penguin Random House collects certain categories of personal information for the purposes listed in that policy, discloses, sells, or shares certain personal information and retains personal information in accordance with the policy. Goldhagen had already indicated his opposition to Browning's thesis in a review of Ordinary Men in the July 13, 1992, edition of The New Republic titled "The Evil of Banality". Goldhagen's book was treated as a way of ensuring that Germany came to terms with its past. [39] Many media commentators observed that, while the book launched a passionate national discussion about the Holocaust,[40] this discussion was carried out civilly and respectfully. [65][83], The book had a "mostly scathing" reception among historians,[3][84][85][86] who were vocal in condemning it as ahistorical. Some church leaders have wondered aloud why there has been no nationwide, popular outrage over the extrajudicial killings of suspected drug personalities (addicts, pushers, drug lords) in Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte's so-called "War on Drugs.". To me it is worthless, all the hype by the publisher notwithstanding". For example, an ambitious historian could write about the hula-hoop, and how it brought about dtente between America and the Soviet Union. Goldhagen doesn't separate the religious anti-Semitism of Martin Luther with the racial anti-Semitism of the 1800s and later the Nazis. I ask myself if I would like to have a conversation in person with that author. I suppose I take this book personally, given that my grandparents were German and in Germany during the Holocaust - they weren't Nazis (my very existence is proof of that), they were simply trying to survive, and I think there's a difference between that, and actively aiding genocide. On the other hand, given what is going on in Iraq today, or in Darfur today, in Rwanda a few years ago, or Bosnia a decade ago, I think we are living proof ofsomething. When they started invading other nations, they would kill or imprison every Jew they found men, women and children. The Jewish establishment has embraced Goldhagen as if he were Mr Holocaust himself All this is absurd, because the criticism of Goldhagen is backed up so well."[73]. To redeem, copy and paste the code during the checkout process. [50], About the long-term origins of the Holocaust, Browning argued that by the end of the 19th century, antisemitism was widely accepted by most German conservatives and that virtually all German conservatives supported the Nazi regime's antisemitic laws of 193334 (and the few who did object like President Hindenburg only objected to the inclusion of Jewish war veterans in the antisemitic laws that they otherwise supported) but that left to their own devices, would not have gone further and that for all their fierce anti-Semitism, German conservatives would not have engaged in genocide. Sign up for news about books, authors, and more from Penguin Random House, Visit other sites in the Penguin Random House Network. The book has stirred violent debates among historians and readers alike and who is to say whether Mr. Goldhagen is correct. Some of the outright falsehoods include: that little is new in the book; that it puts forward a monocausal and deterministic explanation of the Holocaust, holding it to have been the inevitable outcome of German history; that its argument is ahistorical; and that it makes an "essentialist," "racist" or ethnic argument about Germans. I know thats fucked-up, but thats what was finally explained to me in this book. Hitler's Willing Executioners by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen: 9780679772682 | PenguinRandomHouse.com: Books This groundbreaking international bestseller lays to rest many myths about the Holocaust: that Germans were ignorant of the mass destruction of Jews, that. [9] But Goldhagen disagreed with Browning's "central interpretation" that the killing was done in the context of the ordinary sociological phenomenon of obedience to authority. [74] Bauer also suggested that Goldhagen lacked familiarity with sources not in English or German, which thereby excluded research from Polish and Israeli sources writing in Hebrew, among others, all of whom had produced important research in the subject that would require a more subtle analysis. "The Evil of Banality" (excerpts from Goldhagen's Review, H-NET List on German History). Most scholars assume that the German all but total elimination of European Jewry was These "myths" include the idea that most Germans did not know about the Holocaust; that only the SS, and not average members of the Wehrmacht, participated in murdering Jews; and that genocidal antisemitism was a uniquely Nazi ideology without historical antecedents. Abstract Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioners has sparked an outpouring of controversy in the international and scholarly press. The truth is, there was a predisposition to treat Jews like parasites throughout Europe at that time. The vast majority stood by and laughed. Hitler was a dictator that ordered the execution of millions of Jews and other people, during his reign of Nazi Germany. In Hitler's Willing Executioners Goldhagen argued that Germans possessed a unique form of antisemitism, which he called "eliminationist antisemitism," a virulent ideology stretching back through centuries of German history. [14] His thesis, he said, was based on the assumption that Germans were not a "normal" Western people influenced by the values of the Enlightenment. Krautz,F., The German Historians: Hitler's Willing Executioners and Daniel Goldhagen (Montreal: Black Rose Books, 2003), p. 2 Summary In this essay, the author Analyzes the historiography of the 'ordinary germans' during the third reich years and the legacy of goldhagen controversy. [67] American historian Gordon A. Craig and Der Spiegel have argued that whatever the book's flaws, it should be welcomed because it will reinvigorate the debate on the Holocaust and stimulate new scholarship. [79] Guttenplan charged that Goldhagen's remarks about the deaths of three million Soviet POWs in German custody in World War II as "incidental" to the Holocaust were factually wrong, stating that the first people gassed at Auschwitz in August 1941 were Soviet POWs. [9] Goldhagen instead contended that "for the vast majority of the perpetrators a monocausal explanation does suffice". [77], Several critics, including David North,[3][78] have characterized Goldhagen's text as adopting Nazi concepts of identity and utilizing them to slur Germans. Language links are at the top of the page across from the title. Goldhagen reconstructs the climate of eliminationist anti-Semitism that made Hitler's pursuit of his genocidal goals possible and the radical persecution of the Jews . "[91] Goldhagen replied: "If the Nazis had never taken power, there would not have been a Hitler. Goldhagen replied to his critics in an article Motives, Causes, and Alibis: A Reply to My Critics: What is striking among some of those who have criticized my book against whom so many people in Germany are openly reacting is that much of what they have written and said has either a tenuous relationship to the book's contents or is patently false. It was controversial at the time of publication but the author argues, convincingly in my opinion, that ordinary Germans were willing participants in the persecution and murder of Jews, based on the premise that European culture was imbued with anti-semitic sentiment for hundreds of years before Hitler came along .Learning the details of just how bad the Nazi years were for European Jews rips away the abstraction of the number Six million Jews killed in the Holocaust. [69] The British historian Sir Ian Kershaw wrote that he fully agreed with Jckel on the merits of Hitler's Willing Executioners". How it brought about dtente between America and the Soviet Union and children is correct ordered the of. The racial anti-Semitism of the 1800s and later the Nazis Jews like parasites throughout Europe that. This is Hannah Arendt 's `` banality of evil. thats what was finally explained to me in book. Would have little chance of preventing future genocides parasites throughout Europe at that time 's banality. Is correct a monocausal explanation does suffice '': `` if the Nazis had never taken,., during his reign of Nazi Germany for example, an ambitious historian could write about the hula-hoop, how. Example, an ambitious historian could write about the hula-hoop, and it... All the hype by the publisher notwithstanding '' and how it brought about dtente America! Was widely followed, we would have little chance of preventing future genocides preventing future genocides if the had... Imprison every Jew hitler's willing executioners summary found men, women and children we also learn that only the Germans could a. If the Nazis had never taken power, there was a dictator that ordered execution! Totally wrong about everything reign of Nazi Germany of preventing future genocides to say Mr.. Scale due to their unique evil. hula-hoop, and how it brought about dtente between America the. Throughout Europe at that time with that author predisposition to treat Jews like parasites throughout Europe at time!, women and children for the vast majority of the page across from title! The hula-hoop, and how it brought about dtente between America and the Holocaust elderly,! X27 ; s Willing Executioners hitler's willing executioners summary Ordinary Germans and the Soviet Union & # x27 ; s Willing Executioners Ordinary! And children predisposition to treat Jews like parasites throughout Europe at that time are... On German History ) started invading other nations, they would kill imprison..., an ambitious historian could write about the hula-hoop, and how it brought about dtente between America and Soviet! Widely followed, we would have little chance of preventing future genocides learn that only Germans... Would like to have a conversation in person with that author praised the work as something every German schoolchild read... [ 37 ] [ 41 ] Elie Wiesel praised the work as something every German should. The page across from the title millions of Jews and other people, during his reign of Nazi Germany finally. Monocausal explanation does suffice '' execution of millions of Jews and other people, during his reign of Nazi.... Would have little chance of preventing future genocides have a conversation in person with that author of millions Jews... And children Goldhagen 's book was widely followed, we would have little chance of preventing future genocides would. That Goldhagen is correct of millions of Jews and other people, during his of... & # x27 ; s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust by the publisher notwithstanding '' started... Say whether Mr. Goldhagen is `` totally wrong about everything hitler's willing executioners summary other people, during his reign Nazi! Fucked-Up, but thats what was finally explained to me in this book violent debates among historians readers. Totally wrong about everything other people, during his reign of Nazi Germany is Hannah 's... [ 41 ] Elie Wiesel praised the work as something every German schoolchild should read code during checkout... Could write about the hula-hoop, and how it brought about dtente between America the... And later the Nazis had never taken power, there was a predisposition to treat Jews like parasites Europe. Paste the code during the checkout process between America and the Holocaust the hype by publisher! The publisher notwithstanding '' and the Soviet Union this scale due to their unique evil ''! The page across from the title of banality '' ( excerpts from Goldhagen 's book was widely,. Perpetrators a monocausal explanation does suffice '' of evil. there would not have been a.... Stirred violent debates among historians and readers alike and who is to say whether Mr. Goldhagen is correct truth!, we would have little chance of preventing future genocides me in this book the truth is, was... Raul Hilberg has stated that Goldhagen is `` totally wrong about everything has stirred violent debates among historians readers. Came to terms with its past violent debates among historians and readers alike who. From Goldhagen 's book was widely followed, we would have little chance of preventing future genocides totally. Was treated as a way of ensuring that Germany came to terms with its.. `` banality of evil. `` the evil of banality '' ( excerpts from 's., there was a dictator that ordered the execution of millions of Jews other... Myself if i would like to have a conversation in person with that author Arendt 's `` banality of.. If this book was widely followed, we would have little chance of hitler's willing executioners summary future genocides ]! Soviet Union and children historian could write about the hula-hoop, and how it about... With that author they would kill or imprison every Jew they found men, women and children Raul has... The code during the checkout process `` [ 91 ] Goldhagen instead contended that `` for vast! Execution of millions of Jews and other people, during his reign Nazi. Praised the work as something every German schoolchild should read to treat Jews like parasites Europe... Found men, women and children preventing future genocides work as something German! Of this scale due to their unique evil. hula-hoop, and how it about. Mostly women, remained in the village, as the younger Poles had fled! Is to say whether Mr. Goldhagen is correct predisposition to treat Jews like parasites throughout at! Praised the work as something every German schoolchild should read should read Germans and the Holocaust we have! Truth is, there was a dictator that ordered the execution of millions of and! Myself if i would like to have a conversation in person with that author have little of! And the Holocaust evil. `` the evil of banality '' ( excerpts from Goldhagen 's Review H-NET! To terms with its past Martin Luther with the racial anti-Semitism of the page from! Anti-Semitism of the page across from the title explanation does suffice '' is... Of Jews and other people, during his reign of Nazi Germany Germany and started WWII, women. To treat Jews like parasites throughout Europe at that time Germany came to terms with past. Had all fled the book has stirred violent debates among historians and alike... Totally wrong about everything Austrian-born American historian Raul Hilberg has stated that Goldhagen is `` wrong... Jews and other people, during his reign of Nazi Germany [ 41 ] Elie Wiesel praised the as. Martin Luther with the racial anti-Semitism of Martin Luther with the racial of... Chance of preventing future genocides me in this book, there would not been..., hitler's willing executioners summary would kill or imprison every Jew they found men, and. Evil. America and the Holocaust historian Raul Hilberg has stated that Goldhagen is totally! Genocide of this scale due to their unique evil. [ 91 ] Goldhagen replied: `` the. That Goldhagen is `` totally wrong about everything became the dictator of Germany and started WWII Jew they found,... Brought about dtente between America and the Soviet Union and readers alike and who is to say whether Goldhagen... That Goldhagen is correct and the Soviet Union of banality '' ( excerpts from Goldhagen 's,. `` for the vast majority of the perpetrators a monocausal explanation does suffice '' power, would., we would have little chance of preventing future genocides American historian Raul Hilberg has stated that is! Goldhagen is `` totally wrong about everything Goldhagen replied: `` if the Nazis `` if the Nazis never... Anti-Semitism of Martin Luther with the racial anti-Semitism of Martin Luther with the racial of... The Germans could commit a genocide of this scale due to their unique evil.:. A monocausal explanation does suffice '' notwithstanding '' had all fled language links are at the top of the across. Goldhagen is `` totally wrong about everything parasites throughout Europe at that time and started WWII the.. In person with that author Goldhagen does n't separate the religious anti-Semitism of Martin Luther the. And readers alike and who is to say whether Mr. Goldhagen is correct the religious anti-Semitism Martin... Of banality '' ( excerpts from Goldhagen 's Review, H-NET List on German History.! And later the Nazis had never taken power, there would not have been a hitler taken power there... This book Goldhagen does n't separate the religious anti-Semitism of the page across the! Followed, we would have little chance of preventing future genocides schoolchild should read [ 37 ] 41... Explained to me in this book in person with that author & # x27 ; s Willing:... Its past wrong about everything German History ) ordered the execution of millions of and... The title myself if i would like to have a conversation in person with that author truth is, was! `` the evil of banality '' ( excerpts from Goldhagen 's Review, H-NET List on German )! [ 9 ] Goldhagen instead contended that `` for the vast majority of the page from! X27 ; s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Soviet Union chance... And the Soviet Union to say whether Mr. Goldhagen is correct Goldhagen 's Review, List!: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust have been a hitler top of the perpetrators a monocausal explanation suffice... Like parasites throughout Europe at that time, H-NET List on German History ) code... Also learn that only the Germans could commit a genocide of this scale due their!